I don’t usually do this, but I read an article on Fox Business that just reaffirmed that some people don’t get it. Whatever “it” may be, they just don’t get. Life isn’t designed to be fair. If it was fair, it wouldn’t work, because everyone would have everything they wanted, and nothing would get done.
So, to begin, I give you the article.
Hopefully you took a second to read it. It’s not very long, and definitely not very thought out. This woman, who, apparently, is a life coach, makes her primary point using rhetorical questions:
The kid who thrives on Chaucer and couldn’t give a hoot about a molecule is going to be steered to an entire career in science because we need to fill those jobs? This is as opposed to finding a way for the science-inclined to afford to get the education to fill that gaping void? Does passion for the subject or talent for it even come into play? Are we looking for mediocre scientists and engineers or people gifted and wide-eyed over the marvels of the field?
I know that rhetorical questions are supposed to be left alone, but let me just start by answering those first and last questions with a NO!!! The “kid who thrives on Chaucer” will most likely still get a literary degree. He will just have to pay more for it. Passionate people will still do what they are passionate about. This is, indeed, “a way for the science-inclined to afford to get the education.” It’s the other people, who aren’t so passionate about anything, that they are trying to persuade into the science fields.
I may be in the minority here, but when I was finishing high school, I had no idea what I wanted to do. I was very interested in science, but what kind? I had no idea. I enjoyed biology, physics, computers and IT, and even chemistry to some degree. I was also very fluent in American and European history, and I loved literature. Okay, put those things together and you get a bunch of hobbies, but nothing that points directly to a career. So, what did I do? I chose Accounting. Why? Because I was working for a CPA at the time, and he taught me a lot. Not only about working, but about life. He was a role model for me. I thought, “Hey, maybe I can follow in his footsteps or something.” Well, I enjoyed accounting for a couple years of community college, but I found out that I enjoyed economics more. Why? I don’t know. Maybe it was because anytime my teacher explained something, he used examples from Gilligan’s Island. So, when I moved to big kid school (A four-year university), I switched my major to Econ. Econ was a lot of work, and by applying the very laws I was learning to my life, I realized that I obtained more satisfaction from doing less book work, and while the business school was still very intensive, the kind of work didn’t feel as much like work to me, and there was much less book work, so I changed my major to Marketing and Advertising. The work was intensive, but fun. Had I known what it was like before I started Accounting three years earlier, I would have probably never went to Accounting.
My point with this story is that many people, like myself, have no idea what they want to be when they grow up. They are interested in everything. Many of these people follow in their parent’s or role model’s footsteps, as I was in the beginning. Others what to pave their own road.
So, back to these tuition rates based on supply and demand. This is brilliant. Had someone told me that I could go to school 15% cheaper if I went into engineering, then I would have done that in a heartbeat. I was always interested in science and design. On top of that, I would have had a better chance at finding work upon graduation. Double plus!!!
Now, the big question, would I have enjoyed it as much as I enjoy what I am doing now? I don’t know. But if not, teaching English overseas definitely doesn’t require Business degree. I could be doing this with any degree. So, “happiness” is really just a moot point.
“The message from Tallahassee could not be blunter: Give us engineers, scientists, health care specialists and technology experts,” Alvarez writes. “Do not worry so much about historians, philosophers, anthropologists and English majors.”
YES!!! EXACTLY!!! Having studied both business and econ, I have a fairly decent understanding of the law of supply and demand. That is exactly what Florida is practicing now. If you don’t need bread, then you probably won’t buy bread no matter how cheap it is, but if you’re starving, then you’ll pay nearly any price for bread, so why shouldn’t universities offer perks for fields that are in demand? Don’t get me wrong. I am a full believer that diversity of skills is essential for a working economy, but if you have too many English majors, then raise the price of tuition for the English field. If you need engineers, then make it cheaper for them to learn how to do their job!
Bryan Ogden is NOT a life coach, but tends to have common sense. His web site is www.bryan-ogden.com and you can follow him on Twitter @tuoggy.